QuantProp. Analyze a trade file ↗
coinback / Experiment result

E-05. Sizing A/B + Monte Carlo (2026-07-09)

Six sizing options on the same breakout signals: Sharpe barely moved, drawdown scaled, and option F was adopted.

Original record: 2026-07-09 · Migrated: 2026-10-27 · Translated from Korean: 2026-10-27
A historical record, not rerun in this migration.

The figures, hypotheses and verdicts of the time are preserved. A past positive result or candidate mention does not mean validated profitability today or a live-trading recommendation. Validation periods that were already used are not treated as new independent validation.

This is an English translation of a preserved Korean original. It describes conditions at the time of writing, not current provider specifications, costs or regulations. Phrases in the original about blocking or avoiding losses interpret simulated experiments and are not realized account results. Statistical trial counts differ from the number of independent strategies or CSV rows.

E-05. Sizing A/B + Monte Carlo (2026-07-09)

OptionReturnSharpeMDDP(MDD≤-15%)
A 50%×293.7%1.20-18.8%92.9%
B 25%×242.5%1.22-9.4%19.4%
C vol target83.3%1.25-16.6%83.5%
D drawdown reduction92.2%1.19-19.8%92.9%
E C+D81.0%1.23-17.4%83.8%
F 25%×2 + vol target36.4%1.25-8.5%12.6%
  • Analysis: sizing barely changes Sharpe (1.19~1.25) and only scales drawdown. D (reducing after the fact) cannot prevent a kill breach — discarded. F adopted (D-007). Monte Carlo reshuffles observations, so it is an optimistic lower bound.

Source and migration evidence

Source: backtest/docs/experiment-log.md#E-05

Original SHA-256: 069c4aaaf53a20930ca8d94ba6365b4ce2b6bc560171d662a4c179ea55a6857c

Raw data and account information are not part of the public package. The original results do not replace statistical or scientific revalidation. The English text is a translation; numbers, tables and charts are carried over unchanged.